Minutes of the BioMinT kick-off meeting (20/01/03) 1. Steering Committee meeting. The committee requested further information on Peter Bracken's role as administrator. Contractual matters Clarification is required on the format and content of the 12-monthly period reports. Peter Bracken to provide an overview of report format, content and submission procedure. Planning It was proposed that the project manual be produced by Terri/Peter Bracken and, when completed, hosted on the password protected BioMinT pages on the Manchester webserver. The webserver space should be set up within the next two weeks. It was proposed that the next meeting be held in Manchester sometime in the second half of March. It was suggested that 3 possible dates be proposed within the next 2 weeks so that participants have enough notice to attend and time to make appropriate travel arrangements. It was also proposed that the first end user club meeting should be held as part of the Manchester meeting, possibly on the following day. Finally it was proposed that BioMinTs scientific officer appointed by the Commission could be invited to the meeting in Manchester. It was agreed that a BioMinT mailing list should be set up and that matters requiring pressing attention should carry the text 'urgent' in the subject line. It was also agreed that, where a suggestion relating to the project is made via email and no response from is made from a partner within 7 days, the partner is considered to have agreed with the suggestion. However, sufficient provision must be made for partners who are absent, on holiday, etc. 2. Work Package 11, Management. Monitoring of work Peter Bracken to Email the time sheet template to the partners. Meeting with EUC members It was proposed that this could take place together with the next technical meeting in March. It was suggested that the completion date of WP5 should be shifted from month 21 to 28, with no affect on duration. The work package would include an additional deliverable at 24 months. 3. Work Packages 8 and 10 It was agreed that the partners should provide a description of 'background' information, such as currently existing software and databases, brought into the project which will ensure clarity on the issue of intellectual property ownership. It was proposed that this should occur by the end of the month. A consortium agreement is to be drafted by mid-Febuary for distribution to all partners.